Alternative formats
Copy of this publication
To obtain a copy of this publication, or to receive it in an alternate format (Braille, large print, etc.), please fill out the Publication Request form or contact:
ISED Citizen Services Centre
Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada
C.D. Howe Building
235 Queen Street
Ottawa, ON K1A 0H5
Canada
Telephone (toll-free in Canada): 1‑800‑328‑6189 span>
Telephone (international): 613‑954‑5031
TTY (for hearing impaired): 1‑866‑694‑8389 span>
Business hours: 8:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time)
Email: ised-isde@ised-isde.gc.ca
International
Total patented inventions: 85,144
- 31% annual growth rate observed between 2011 and 2017.
- 68% of patented inventions were filed between 2011 and 2017.
Patent Filing Trend (1998 – 2017) - Patented Inventions Publication Year | Patented Inventions |
1998 | 1,242 |
1999 | 1,167 |
2000 | 1,245 |
2001 | 1,304 |
2002 | 1,794 |
2003 | 1,799 |
2004 | 1,818 |
2005 | 1,874 |
2006 | 2,141 |
2007 | 2,395 |
2008 | 2,829 |
2009 | 3,447 |
2010 | 3,888 |
2011 | 3,673 |
2012 | 4,568 |
2013 | 5,584 |
2014 | 6,889 |
2015 | 8,602 |
2016 | 10,669 |
2017 | 18,216 |
Patent Filing Trend (1998 – 2017) - Annual Growth Rate Publication Year | Annual Growth Rate |
1998 | - |
1999 | -6.04% |
2000 | 6.68% |
2001 | 4.74% |
2002 | 37.58% |
2003 | 0.28% |
2004 | 1.06% |
2005 | 3.08% |
2006 | 14.25% |
2007 | 11.86% |
2008 | 18.12% |
2009 | 21.85% |
2010 | 12.79% |
2011 | -5.53% |
2012 | 24.37% |
2013 | 22.24% |
2014 | 23.37% |
2015 | 24.87% |
2016 | 24.03% |
2017 | 70.74% |
Chinese and American assignees cumulatively accounted for 65% of total patented inventions filed globally.
Patent Filing Trend (1998 – 2017) Publication Year | China | United States | Japan | Republic of Korea | Germany | Canada | United Kingdom | Australia |
1998 | 5 | 337 | 435 | 18 | 97 | 14 | 12 | 2 |
1999 | 5 | 272 | 443 | 26 | 98 | 10 | 5 | 0 |
2000 | 11 | 335 | 395 | 53 | 87 | 6 | 8 | 3 |
2001 | 15 | 406 | 341 | 42 | 66 | 13 | 9 | 2 |
2002 | 19 | 459 | 363 | 37 | 114 | 32 | 28 | 3 |
2003 | 54 | 457 | 333 | 42 | 85 | 16 | 15 | 3 |
2004 | 72 | 434 | 334 | 51 | 91 | 26 | 9 | 4 |
2005 | 86 | 455 | 420 | 65 | 111 | 18 | 9 | 12 |
2006 | 116 | 560 | 480 | 72 | 92 | 21 | 24 | 20 |
2007 | 192 | 716 | 447 | 139 | 103 | 34 | 17 | 17 |
2008 | 423 | 772 | 496 | 170 | 126 | 43 | 18 | 11 |
2009 | 697 | 976 | 510 | 165 | 142 | 58 | 19 | 14 |
2010 | 960 | 1,074 | 493 | 127 | 154 | 46 | 21 | 27 |
2011 | 1,059 | 961 | 407 | 178 | 118 | 50 | 22 | 23 |
2012 | 1,932 | 967 | 387 | 197 | 129 | 50 | 35 | 16 |
2013 | 2,631 | 1,429 | 484 | 276 | 195 | 61 | 55 | 13 |
2014 | 3,513 | 1,832 | 443 | 402 | 163 | 69 | 33 | 19 |
2015 | 4,655 | 2,064 | 539 | 385 | 141 | 69 | 41 | 15 |
2016 | 6,180 | 2,386 | 622 | 471 | 173 | 81 | 46 | 27 |
2017 | 11,955 | 3,477 | 794 | 690 | 227 | 135 | 71 | 23 |
IP Concentration Index
Index approaching 0.5 in 2017 thereby indicating dominance of two countries in AI patent activity.
- Metric developed to gauge the level of concentration of AI patented inventions by country of origin.
- Index ranges between 1/n and 1, where n is the number of participants.
IP Concentration Index Publication Year | IP Concentration Index |
1998 | 0.19 |
1999 | 0.20 |
2000 | 0.17 |
2001 | 0.16 |
2002 | 0.11 |
2003 | 0.10 |
2004 | 0.09 |
2005 | 0.11 |
2006 | 0.12 |
2007 | 0.13 |
2008 | 0.13 |
2009 | 0.14 |
2010 | 0.15 |
2011 | 0.16 |
2012 | 0.22 |
2013 | 0.27 |
2014 | 0.32 |
2015 | 0.35 |
2016 | 0.38 |
2017 | 0.46 |
Canadian Researchers
Patented inventions filed by Canadian researchers grew at a similar rate when compared to researchers globally over the past five years.
2,497 Canadian researchers filed 1,419 patented inventions.
Patent Filing Trend (1998 – 2017) Publication Year | CIPO | USPTO | WIPO (PCT) | Other | Annual Growth Rate |
1998 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | - |
1999 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 0 | -7.69% |
2000 | 9 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 66.67% |
2001 | 4 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 45.00% |
2002 | 17 | 31 | 10 | 0 | 100.00% |
2003 | 14 | 29 | 5 | 1 | -15.52% |
2004 | 12 | 17 | 10 | 1 | -18.37% |
2005 | 13 | 15 | 5 | 1 | -15.00% |
2006 | 12 | 28 | 9 | 4 | 55.88% |
2007 | 10 | 45 | 12 | 1 | 28.30% |
2008 | 16 | 40 | 20 | 3 | 16.18% |
2009 | 31 | 52 | 14 | 0 | 22.78% |
2010 | 14 | 64 | 18 | 2 | 1.03% |
2011 | 22 | 45 | 11 | 0 | -20.41% |
2012 | 16 | 40 | 18 | 1 | -3.85% |
2013 | 11 | 40 | 16 | 4 | -5.33% |
2014 | 21 | 43 | 24 | 5 | 30.99% |
2015 | 16 | 66 | 23 | 6 | 19.35% |
2016 | 20 | 65 | 36 | 13 | 18.92% |
2017 | 25 | 138 | 34 | 14 | 58.33% |
Canadian Institutions
Canadian institutions account for less than 1% of the total patented inventions filed by institutions globally.
284 Canadian institutions filed 618 patented inventions.
Patent Filing Trend (1998 – 2017) Publication Year | CIPO | USPTO | WIPO (PCT) | Others |
1998 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 1 |
1999 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
2000 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
2001 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 0 |
2002 | 15 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
2003 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
2004 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 0 |
2005 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
2006 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
2007 | 11 | 12 | 7 | 1 |
2008 | 13 | 3 | 15 | 2 |
2009 | 12 | 10 | 13 | 0 |
2010 | 6 | 12 | 10 | 2 |
2011 | 12 | 14 | 9 | 1 |
2012 | 11 | 13 | 13 | 2 |
2013 | 7 | 14 | 7 | 1 |
2014 | 13 | 12 | 12 | 3 |
2015 | 13 | 18 | 17 | 2 |
2016 | 19 | 19 | 30 | 1 |
2017 | 20 | 53 | 33 | 7 |
Patent Filing Trend (1998 – 2017) - Annual Growth Rate Publication Year | Annual Growth Rate |
1998 | - |
1999 | -50% |
2000 | -67% |
2001 | 500% |
2002 | 100% |
2003 | -38% |
2004 | 27% |
2005 | -53% |
2006 | 78% |
2007 | 94% |
2008 | 6% |
2009 | 6% |
2010 | -14% |
2011 | 20% |
2012 | 8% |
2013 | -26% |
2014 | 38% |
2015 | 25% |
2016 | 38% |
2017 | 61% |
Relative Specialization Index (RSI)
Canadian researchers and institutions are both specialized in the field of AI, although their specialization has decreased over the past decade.
Researcher’s Country of Origin Publication Year | 1998-2007 | 2008-2017 |
Republic of Korea | -0.56 | -0.44 |
Germany | -0.06 | -0.27 |
Japan | -0.07 | -0.18 |
United Kingdom | -0.14 | -0.03 |
Australia | 0.12 | 0.22 |
Canada | 0.34 | 0.30 |
United States | 0.40 | 0.35 |
Institution’s Country of Origin Publication Year | 1998-2007 | 2008-2017 |
Republic of Korea | -0.21 | -0.26 |
Germany | 0.00 | -0.24 |
United Kingdom | -0.08 | -0.13 |
Japan | 0.62 | 0.11 |
Canada | 0.26 | 0.22 |
Australia | 0.31 | 0.22 |
United States | 0.38 | 0.34 |
Relative Specialization by AI Applications
Canadian researchers fare well in various applications of AI against American researchers who are considered to be prolific filers in AI.
Relative Specialization by AI Applications AI Application | Canada | United States |
Distributed Artificial Intelligence | -0.55 | -0.65 |
Planning and Scheduling | -0.17 | -0.28 |
Control Methods | -0.02 | 0.12 |
Speech Processing | 0.09 | -0.06 |
Predictive Analytics | 0.08 | 0.32 |
Robotics | 0.42 | 0.34 |
Knowledge Representation and Reasoning | 0.48 | 0.29 |
Computer Vision | 0.43 | 1.72 |
Natural Language Processing | 1.32 | 2.41 |
Geographical Clusters of Activity
Interestingly, most of the prominent Census Metropolitan Areas (CMAs) are specialized in different application fields of AI.
Patented Inventions / GDP Province | Patented Inventions / GDP |
Northwest Territories | 0 |
Nunavut | 0 |
Alberta | 1.68208E-10 |
Yukon | 0 |
Saskatchewan | 1.48738E-10 |
Newfoundland and Labrador | 1.20333E-10 |
Ontario | 3.71479E-10 |
British Columbia | 3.63912E-10 |
Manitoba | 5.50297E-11 |
Quebec | 2.03698E-10 |
New Brunswick | 1.62311E-10 |
Nova Scotia | 1.35275E-10 |
Prince Edward Island | 1.4298E-10 |
# of Institutions CMA | # of Institutions |
Calgary | 19 |
Edmonton | 4 |
Guelph | 2 |
Halifax | 5 |
Hamilton | 4 |
Kingston | 3 |
Kitchener-Cambridge-Waterloo | 20 |
Lethbridge | 1 |
London | 2 |
Moncton | 1 |
Montréal | 42 |
Oshawa | 2 |
Ottawa-Gatineau | 30 |
Québec | 4 |
Regina | 1 |
Saskatoon | 4 |
Sherbrooke' | 1 |
St. Catharines-Niagara | 1 |
St. John's | 1 |
Toronto | 78 |
Trois-Rivières | 2 |
Vancouver | 30 |
Victoria | 4 |
Winnipeg | 3 |
Permission to reproduce
Except as otherwise specifically noted, the information in this publication may be reproduced, in part or in whole and by any means, without charge or further permission from the Department of Industry, provided that due diligence is exercised in ensuring the accuracy of the information reproduced; that the Department of Industry is identified as the source institution; and that the reproduction is not represented as an official version of the information reproduced, or as having been made in affiliation with, or with the endorsement of, the Department of Industry.
For permission to reproduce the information in this publication for commercial purposes, please fill out the Application for Crown Copyright Clearance or contact the ISED Citizen Services Centre mentioned above.
Ⓒ Her Majesty the Queen in right of Canada, as represented by the Minister of Industry,
2020
Aussi offert en français sous le titre Traitement de l’intelligence artificielle : aperçu du paysage canadien des brevets.