Arrangement for the Coordination of Frequencies for Radiobeacons in the Band 200-405 kc/s in Certain Areas of Canada and Greenland

Spectrum Management
Terrestrial Radiocommunication Agreements and Arrangements


Note

All persons making use of this consolidation are reminded that the documents included herein are provided only for convenience of reference. This consolidation is for the guidance of those engaged in radiocommunications in Canada. The information contained in this document is subject to change without notice. While every reasonableeffort has been made to ensure accuracy, no warranty is expressed or implied. For more details, please contact the Terrestrial Services Frequency Management Division (International Systems).

The agreements and arrangements contained herein have been negotiated under the authority of the Government of Canada by the Department of Communications whose spectrum management and telecommunications programs have been transferred to Industry Canada.

All notes in square brackets [ ] were added for clarification purposes.

Prepared by:

Industry Canada
Radiocommunications and Broadcasting Regulatory Branch
300 Slater Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0C8

Publication Date: October 1994


Date: 8th February 1966

KINGDOM OF DENMARK
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS

GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF POSTS AND TELEGRAPHS

Tietgensgade 372 København V

1.T. No. 672

Department of Transport
Hunter Building
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada

Co-ordination of frequencies in the band 200-405 kc/s

Ref-No. 5856-5 (SRE-B)

Ref. date 18.1.66

Dear Sir,

With reference to your above mentioned letter I hereby have the honour to inform youthat my administration agrees that the arrangement for coordination of frequencies forradiobeacons in the band 200-405 kc/s in certain areas of Canada and Greenland tookeffect on the date of receipt of your letter, i.e., the 24th of January 1966. I wish to thankyou for your co-operation in this matter.

The following radiobeacons from your recapitulatory list of radiobeacons in northernCanada, forwarded with your above letter, have not earlier been known to us orco-ordinated in accordance with the now agreed procedure:

  • 215 kc/s   Queen Elizabeth
  • 221 kc/s   Queen Elizabeth
  • 246 kc/s   Queen Elizabeth
  • 255 kc/s   Queen Elizabeth
  • 281 kc/s   Queen Elizabeth
  • 298 kc/s   Charles Is.
  • 308 kc/s   Grappling Is.
  • 309 kc/s   Nottingham Is.
  • 316 kc/s   Cape Acadia
  • 316 kc/s   Cape Makkovik
  • 320 kc/s   Ashe Inlet
  • 324 kc/s   Swaffiel Hbr.

After examination of these assignments I can inform you that my administration hasno objection to the use of these radiobeacons with characteristics as mentioned in the list.With respect to the Beacon Hall Beach on 385 kc/s I shall, as mentioned in my earlierletter, revert to the matter as soon as possible.

Yours faithfully,

Hans Laursen
For the Director General.


I.T. 8748

5856-5 (SRE-B)

Hunter Building
Ottawa, Ontario

AIRMAIL

January 18, 1966

Director-General
General Directorate of Posts and Telegraphs
Ministry of Public Works
Tietgenagade 37
Copenhagen, Denmark

Dear Sir:

Co-ordination of Frequency Assignments in the Band 200-405 kc/s

Thank you for your letter of October 15, 1965 concerning a proposed informalarrangement between our Administrations for the co-ordination of frequencies forradiobeacons in the band 200-405 kc/s, applicable to certain areas of Canada andGreenland.

Regarding the co-ordination procedure outlined in my letter of September 11, 1964,this Administration agrees to all of the changes proposed in your letter of October 15,1965. Since we have now reached agreement on the procedure to be followed, I wouldpropose that this arrangement take effect on the date of receipt of this letter by yourAdministration. It is also proposed that the arrangement may be terminated when eitherAdministration gives at least three months written notice to the other Administration.

As requested, I have enclosed a recapitulative list of Canadian radiobeacons locatedwithin the co-ordination zone.

I would like to receive confirmation that the final details outlined in this letter aresatisfactory to your Administration.

Yours truly,

(F.G. Nixon),
Director,
Telecommunications and Electronics Branch

Encl.


(All stations are in area a) - those also in area b) shown by asterisk*)

Existing Radiobeacon Stations in Designated Areas of Northern Canada
Station Co-ordinates Frequency Call Sign Type of Emission Power
Pelly Bay 68.27 N 89.45 W 201 UF 2.04A2 400
Cape Parry 70.10 N 124.44 W 203 UE 2.04A2 400
Knob Lake 54.50 N 66.50 W 203 KL 2.04A2 400
Slidre Bay 80.01 N 86.11 W 205 EU 2.04A2 100
Frobisher * 63.44 N 68.33 W 206 FY 2.04A2 3000
Clinton Point 69.35 N 120.48 W 209 UH 2.04A2 400
Mackar Inlet 68.18 N 85.40 W 212 UU 2.04A2 400
Jenny Lind 68.40 N 101.44 W 218 UQ 2.04A2 400
Raven 55.18 N 75.16 W 220 EZ 2.04A2 100
Retty 55.16 N 64.04 W 220 EF 2.04A2 100
Lady Franklin 68.29 N 113.13 W 227 UJ 2.04A2 400
Broughton * 67.33 N 63.49 W 230 VM 2.04A2 400
Mould Bay 76.20 N 119.50 W 230 MD 2.04A2 100
Hall Beach 68.45 N 81.14 W 239 UX 2.04A2 400
Cambridge Bay 69.07 N 105.01 W 245 CB 2.04A2 2000
Cape Dyer * 66.39 N 61.23 W 248 VN 2.04A2 400
Goose 53.17 N 60.21 W 257 YR 2.04A2 400
        6A3  
Rowley 69.03 N 79.02 W 257 UG 2.04A2 400
Cape Young 68.56 N 116.56 W 260 UI 2.04A2 400
Frobisher * 63.44 N 68.33 W 263 FB 2.04A2 400
        6A3  
Jamis 51.58 N 68.08 W 263 NK 2.04A2 400
Isachsen 78.50 N 103.50 W 265 IC 2.04A2 100
Byron Bay 68.45 N 109.04 W 272 UK 2.04A2 400
Cartwright 53.44 N 56.58 W 273 CA 2.04A2 400
Longstaff Bluff 68.54 N 75.10 W 275 UV 2.04A2 400
Frobisher * 63.45 N 68.31 W 278 TOWER 6A3 30
Advance 55.16 N 64.49 W 284 KE 2.04A2 100
Eagle 55.15 N 73.45 W 284 KY 2.04A2 100
Cape Hopes Advance * 61.05 N 69.33 W 285 HA 2.04A2 400
Cape Hooper * 68.26 N 66.44 W 287 UZ 2.04A2 400
Coral Harbour 64.08 N 83.13 W 290 ZS 2.04A2 400
        6A3  
Resolution Island * 61.20 N 64.53 W 292 DD 2.04A2 400
Gladman Point 68.40 N 97.49 W 300 UR 2.04A2 400
NW River (Goose) 53.29 N 60.05 W 300 RR 2.04A2 400
Resolution Island * 61.18 N 64.53 W 304 R 2.04A2 50
Brass 55.12 N 69.01 W 308 NJ 2.04A2 100
Burton 54.59 N 78.17 W 308 KE 2.04A2 100
Kivatee Lake * 67.57 N 64.55 W 309 JX 2.04A2 25
Dewar Lakes 68.41 N 71.15 W 315 UW 2.04A2 400
Frobisher * 63.43 N 68.27 W 315 F 2.04A2 25
Border 55.21 N 63.12 W 318 EC 2.04A2 100
Robin 55.15 N 72.12 W 318 EW 2.04A2 100
Shepherd Bay 68.49 N 93.26 W 321 US 2.04A2 400
Knob Lake 54.46 N 66.46 W 323 KR 2.04A2 400
Frobisher * 63.44 N 68.31 W 341 B 2.04A2 25
Cape Harrison 54.46 N 57.40 W 344 CP 2.04A2 400
Cape Christian * 70.34 N 68.23 W 350 CC 2.04A2 800
        6A3  
Gillespie 55.11 N 67.35 W 350 EH 2.04A2 100
Sparrow 55.16 N 76.47 W 350 KB 2.04A2 100
Bulldog 55.11 N 70.35 W 358 EQ 2.04A2 100
Cape Jones 54.38 N 79.45 W 358 KH 2.04A2 100
Harp Lake 55.19 N 61.50 W 358 IB 2.04A2 100
Saglek 58.29 N 62.35 W 360 SV 2.04A2 400
Coral Harbour 64.09 N 83.22 W 362 CZ 2.04A2 2000
Nitchequon 53.12 N 70.54 W 364 NI 2.04A2 400
        6A3  
Hopedale 55.29 N 60.15 W 367 HO 2.04A2 100
Great Whale River 55.17 N 77.45 W 371 GW 2.04A2 500
Coppermine 67.47 N 115.15 W 372 CO 2.04A2 400
Brevsort 63.21 N 64.10 W 377 BZ 2.04A2 400
Cambridge Bay 69.07 N 105.07 W 382 VK 2.04A2 400
Ft. Chime 58.03 N 68.30 W 390 VP 2.04A2 400
        6A3  
Resolute Bay 74.43 N 94.59 W 391 RU 2.04A2 100
Wabush 52.57 N 66.53 W 400 WK 2.04A2 500

Date: 15th October 1965

KINGDOM OF DENMARK
MINISTRY OF PUBLIC WORKS

GENERAL DIRECTORATE OF POSTS AND TELEGRAPHS

Tietgensgade 372 København V

1.T. No. 8748

Department of Transport
Hunter Building
Ottawa, Ontario
Canada

Co-ordination of Frequencies in the Band 200-405 kc/s

Ref. No.
5856-5
6801-439-1
(SRE(B))

Ref. date
11.9.64

Dear Sir,

With reference to your above letter concerning the agreement between ouradministrations as regards co-ordination of frequencies for radiobeacons in the frequencyband 200-405 kc/s I have the honour to inform you that further consideration has beengiven to the definition of the co-ordination areas previously indicated.

I am now of opinion that it would be more convenient to let the co-ordination areas bedetermined by the service ranges of the radiobeacons to be co-ordinated rather than bythe powers of the beacons, thus being in line with Article 7 of the Radio Regulations. Ishould therefore like to suggest that the following limits be applied:

  • Area a) Radiobeacons with a service range of 100  km
  • Area b) All radiobeacons
  • Area c) Radiobeacons with a service range of 350  km

As to the geographical limits proposed by you in our previous correspondence it isfound that these areas cover the most relevant parts of your territory and, consequently, Ican agree to these areas, but as far as area b) is concerned I should prefer to include all ofthe Canadian territory north of 75 degrees north lying east of 125 degrees west. Thisminor change appears logical in view of the close location of the Greenland and Canadianterritories in the farthest north.

Far as Greenland is concerned, I am quite prepared to co-ordinate all radiobeacons inthe band under consideration in the area west of 35 degrees west, and for the remainingGreenland territory I will co-ordinate all radiobeacons having a service range of 350  km ,or more.

I agree that endeavours should be made to apply a protection ratio of at least 15 dbbetween the desired and the undesired signal at the extremity of the service range of thedesired aeronautical or maritime radiobeacon.

The Danish Administration agrees to the suggestion made by you that routineco-ordination of assignments under this agreement could be handled by air-mailcorrespondence between our two Administrations. We agree that the Administration withwhich co-ordination is sought should acknowledge receipt of the co-ordination data within30 days, and within a further period of 60 days should provide substantive comments onthe matter. In the event that the Administration with which co-ordination is sought doesnot reply within 90 days, that Administration shall be assumed to agree with theassignment in question.

Among the Danish radiobeacons in Greenland previously agreed upon in ourcorrespondence, some changes have occurred in the call signs in order to align these withthe last two letters of the ICAO-location-indicators. Therefore, I enclose a revised list ofexisting and planned radiobeacons in Greenland as agreed, the changed call signs beingincluded in the list.

I should like to receive your comments on the above suggestions concerning theco-ordination areas. If the suggested classification of the co-ordination areas according toservice ranges is acceptable to you, I should like to receive from you a recapitulated list ofCanadian radiobeacons in the band 200-405 kc/s with the service ranges indicated.

Yours faithfully,

Barge Nielsen

For the Director General

Coordination of frequencies
Frequency kc/s Call Sign Station and Location Range km Class of station Type of emission
210 GD Groennedal
48W06 61N14
55 AL 2.04A2
210 QS Qutdligssat
52W51 70N03
55 AL 2.04A2
215 EM Egedesminde
52W45 68N42
90 AL 2.04A2
219 +) XMP 6 Narssarssuak
45W25 61N11
40 AL 6A3
222 +) XPJ 8 Soendrestroemfjord
50W57 66N58
40 AL 6A3
228 NS Narssaq
45W58 60N54
55 AL 2.04A2
234 RS Ravns Storoe
50W25 62N43
90 ALNL 2.04A2
234 JN Jakobshavn
51W03 69N13
55 AL 2.04A2
265 JH Julianehaab
46W03 60N43
55 AL 2.04A2
265 CH Christianshaab
51W05 68N49
55 AL 2.04A2
268 +) QA Qaqatoqaq
52W52 66N38
100 AL 2.04A2
270 NN Nanortalik
45W13 60N08
55 ALNL 2.04A2
278 +) XPH 5 Thule
69W00 76N30
40 AL 6A3
279 +) SI Simiutak
46W36 60N41
200 AL 0.1A1
283 +) KK Kulusuk
37W11 65N32
360 AL 2.04A2
290 +) CL Soendrestroemfjord
50W40 66N58
200 AL 2.04A2
298 +) KU Kookoeerne
52W00 64N02
270 ALNL 2.04A2
302   Chruncher Island
53W33 66N01
150 ALNL  
302 GH Godthaab
51W45 64N10
55 AL 2.04A2
306 VE Vester Eiland
53W24 68N37
270 NL 0.1A1
306 GN Godhavn
53W31 69N14
270 AL 2.04A2
307 FD Frederiksdal
44W38 60N01
90 NL 0.1A1
310 ST Sukkertoppen
52W52 65N24
90 ALNL 2.04A2
314 +) FN Faeringehavn
51W33 63N42
55 AL 2.04A2
318 +) AS Angissoq
45W11 59N58
130 AL 2.04A2
328 +) HB Holsteinsborg
53W42 66N56
350 AL 0.1A1
331 FH Frederikshaab
49W39 62N00
270 AL 2.04A2
335 +) L Thule
68W49 76N32
1000 AL 2.04A2
347 0YG Mesters Vig
23W55 72N14
500 AL 0.1A12.1A2
354 UM Umanak
52W00 70N40
90 AL 2.04A2
359 +) NA Narssarssuaq
45W23 61N10
100 AL 0.1A1
372 +) OZN Prins Christian Sund
43W10 60N04
350 AL 0.1A1
382 +) SF Soendrestroemfjord
50W57 66N58
1500 AL 2.04A2
396 +) MV Mestersvig
23W55 72N14
200 AL 2.1A26A3
399 +) UP Upernavik
56W09 72N48
350 AL 0.1A1
404 +) NO Nord
16W40 81N36
350 AL 0.1A1

Frequencies marked +) are in use.


5856-5
6801-439-1 (SRE(B)

Hunter Building
Ottawa, Ontario

AIRMAIL

September 11, 1964

Director-General
General Directorate of Posts and Telegraphs
Ministry of Public Works
Tietgensgade 37
Copenhagen
Denmark

Dear Sir:

Coordination of Frequency Assignments in the Band 200-405 kc/s

This refers to my letter of October 17, 1962 and your reply of July 21, 1964, reference 1.T. No. 6514 concerning a proposed arrangement between our two Administrations forthe coordination of existing and planned radiobeacon assignments in the bands between200 and 405 kc/s in adjacent areas of Canada and Greenland. We are pleased to note youragreement to the existing radiobeacon assignments in designated areas of northernCanada, as contained in the annex to our letter of October 17, 1962, also your concurrencein the protection ratio of 15  dB .

With regard to the limits of the coordination area proposed in my letter, these wereconsidered adequate to provide good protection to radiobeacon assignments in the Arcticarea. However, your suggestion to co-ordinate high power radiobeacons in a more distantarea of Canada has considerable merit, assuming that your Administration is prepared totake equivalent action with respect to radiobeacons in Greenland.

Noting your agreement in principle to the limits of Area a) - (100 watts or more) andArea b) - (25 watts or more) suggested in my letter of October 17, 1962, I would like topropose a third coordination area south of 52 degrees North, to include the southern halfof the Province of Quebec, all of New Brunswick and Newfoundland and the northern halfof Nova Scotia, as follows:

Area c)
From the North Pole southward along meridian 55°W to its intersectionwith parallel 52°N, thence westward to its intersection with meridian 80°W,thence southward to its intersection with parallel 45°N, thence eastward toits intersection with meridian 52°W, thence northward along meridian 52°Wto the North Pole.

In Area c) there are no existing Canadian radiobeacons in the bands between 200 and405 kc/s having a power of 1000 watts or more. We propose to supply particulars of anyplanned Canadian radiobeacon assignments in the 200-405 kc/s band in Area c) where thepeak power is 1000 watts or more.

In the matter of bi-lateral action, it would be helpful for us to have particulars of all radiobeacons in the band 200-405 kc/s in adjacent areas of Greenland, in order to assistour planning and to provide the best possible protection to your low-power stations.Therefore, it is suggested for your consideration, that coordination with thisAdministration be sought for all 200-405 kc/s radiobeacon assignments in Greenland westof meridian 35°W regardless of power, and for all such assignments east of meridian 35°Winvolving transmitter power of 1000 watts or more.

In carrying out coordination under this arrangement each Administration wouldrecognize the sovereign right of the other to regulate its use of the radio spectrum, andeach would not necessarily be bound by the views of the other. Nevertheless, in keepingwith the spirit of international cooperation, this Administration is prepared to takeimmediate action to alleviate actual cases of interference to radiobeacons in Greenland inthe 200-405 kc/s band caused by Canadian assignments, regardless of the power orlocation of the Canadian stations involved.

It is considered that routine coordination of assignments under this Arrangementcould be handled by air mail correspondence between our two Administrations. It issuggested that the Administration with which coordination is sought should acknowledgereceipt of the coordination data within 30 days, and within a further period of 60 daysshould provide substantive comments on the matter. In the event that the Administrationwith which coordination is sought does not reply within 90 days, that Administrationshall be assumed to agree with the assignment in question.

I would appreciate receiving your early comments on the contents of this letter, andany other suggestions regarding our proposed coordination arrangement.

Yours truly,

(F.G. Nixon)
Director
Telecommunications and Electronics Branch


5856-5
6801-439-1

AIRMAIL

Ottawa, October 17, 1962

Director General
General Directorate of Posts and Telegraphs
Ministry of Public Works
Tietgensgade 37
Copenhagen
Denmark

Dear Sir:

I would refer to your letter of April 12, 1962, reference 1.T. No. 2992, concerninginterference to the maritime radiobeacon Koak-cerne (Greenland) operating on 314 kc/swith a service range of 50 n.m., caused by Canadian radiobeacon FY at Frobisher Bay,operating on 315 kc/s with a service range of 200 n.m. It is believed that this problem willbe satisfactorily resolved by our proposal to change Frobisher Bay radiobeacon FY from315 kc/s to 206 kc/s, conveyed to you in our telegram of September 5, 1962, and agreed toin your telegram of September 10, 1962.

I regret the delay in replying to this remaining paragraphs of your letter, whichpropose an administrative arrangement between our two Administrations for theco-ordination of existing and planned radiobeacon frequency assignments in the bandsbetween 200 and 405 kc/s for adjacent areas of northern Canada and Greenland. I thankyou for the particulars of planned and existing radiobeacons (200-405 kc/s) in Greenland,contained in Annexes 1 and 2 of your letter. These particulars have been examined inrelation to existing and planned radiobeacons in northern Canada and we anticipate nointerference from the radiobeacons in question.

In the matter of a continuing arrangement between our two Administrations for theco-ordination of frequency assignments for radiobeacons in the bands between 200 and405 kc/s, it is believed that such an arrangement would be to our mutual advantage andcould be brought into effect by a continuation of this exchange of correspondence.This matter has been studied in some detail and, noting that you have suppliedparticulars of existing and proposed radiobeacons in Greenland, I now propose to supplysimilar details for adjacent areas of northern Canada, as follows:

Area a)
From the North Pole southward along meridian 125°W to its intersectionwith the Arctic Circle, thence eastward along the Arctic Circle to itsintersection with 80°W, thence southward along meridian 80°W to itsintersection with parallel 52°W, thence eastward along parallel 52°W to itsintersection with 55°W, thence northward along meridian 55°W to theNorth Pole.
Area b)
From the North Pole southward along meridian 70°W to its intersectionwith parallel 60°W, thence eastward along parallel 60°N to its intersectionwith 55°W, thence northward along meridian 55°W to the North Pole.

In the case of Area a), we propose to supply particulars of existing and plannedradiobeacons within the band 200-405 kc/s having a peak envelope power ( Pp ), as definedin Article 1, No. 95 of the Geneva Radio Regulations, of 100 watts or more; and in thecase of Area b), those having a Pp of 25 watts or more.

A list of existing radiobeacons having the specified powers within the designated areasis contained in the Annex to this letter. The list is complete as of this date and wepropose to provide your Administration with similar details of any planned radiobeaconassignments in these areas, on a continuing basis, in order to effect co-ordination of suchassignments prior to their actual implementation. It is assumed that details of plannedradiobeacons in Greenland will also be provided by your Administration on a continuingbasis, for co-ordination purposes. In carrying our such co-ordination, each country wouldrecognize the sovereign right of the other country to regulate its use of radio frequencies,and each would not necessarily be bound by the views of the other.

In Canada, the daylight service range of aeronautical radiobeacons is based on aminimum field strength of 70 micovolts per meter, in accordance with therecommendations of the International Civil Aviation Organization. In the case ofmaritime radiobeacons, the daylight service range is based on a minimum field strengthof 50 microvolts per meter, pursuant to Article 7 No. 461 of the ITU RadioRegulations (Geneva, 1959). With regard to protection ratios, the Geneva RadioRegulations (Article 7No. 433) provide, in the case of aeronautical radiobeacons, a ratio of a least 10  dB for eachbeacon throughout its service area. In Canada, we endeavour to provide a protection ratioof at least 15  dB between the undesired and desired signal at the extremity of the servicerange of the desired signal, for all aeronautical and maritime beacons. Perhaps yourAdministration could agree to these values, for frequency co-ordination purposes.

The foregoing tentative proposals are submitted as a basis for further discussion. Weare prepared to give careful consideration to the exchange of information additional tothat contained in the Annex to this letter for radiobeacons operating in the bands between200 and 405 kc/s, including any suggestions you may have as to amended power levels,co-ordination areas, interference ratios, etc. I would appreciate receiving your commentson this matter at your convenience.

Yours truly,

(F.G. Nixon)
Director
Telecommunications and Electronics Branch

Attachment