NRC is seeking a ceramic powder processing solution that will upgrade raw ceramic powder into a uniformly coated, sinterable, hybrid carbon nanotube ceramic powder with > 1 kg / h production rates, in order for NRC to do further research into possible applications for this new stronger composite material such as light-weight armours.
Sponsoring department: National Research Council (NRC)
Funding mechanism: Contract
Opening date: September 3, 2019
Closing date: October 29, 2019 14:00 Eastern Daylight Time
Please refer to the tender notice for this challenge on Buy and Sell.
Log in to view your submissions
Challenge
Problem statement
Carbon nanotubes have great potential for mechanical reinforcement in composite materials, including ceramic composites. However, bundling of the carbon nanotubes has prevented this potential from being realized. To overcome these bundling issues, the carbon nanotubes are being deposited by chemical vapour deposition methods onto ceramic powders, which have been stained with the catalyst. The resulting hybrid powders can then be sintered into the composite, in other words, compacted and bonded at high temperature and pressure into a solid plate. The nanotubes are deposited in an unbundled state on the ceramic powder and remain that way after sintering, which is the desired outcome, but the lack of uniformity in the deposition results in weaknesses of the material. In order to get a uniform distribution of these unbundled carbon nanotubes in the composite, the carbon nanotubes must be uniformly deposited onto the ceramic powders. There are technical challenges to overcome in getting this uniform deposition, including issues with catalyst causing the powder to clump up and the need for a uniform gas flow around the catalyst coated ceramic powders during the chemical vapour deposition process. This call concerns overcoming these challenges. NRC is seeking a ceramic powder processing solution that will upgrade raw ceramic powder into a uniformly coated, sinterable, hybrid carbon nanotube ceramic powder that can be produced with production rates > 1 kg / h.
Desired outcomes and considerations
Essential (mandatory) outcomes
Proposed solutions must:
- Produce a uniform distribution of carbon nanotubes at loadings up to 3% (by weight) on the surface of ground alumina powder grains starting from neat alumina powder. The neat alumina powder must be of a size of 0.5 µm or less The loading (measured by thermal gravimetric analysis in air) must have a precision of better than 0.1%. The uniformity must be confirmable by imaging under a scanning electron microscope and there cannot be regions where the alumina grains are not loaded with nanotubes.
- Deposit high quality carbon nanotubes onto the powder grains, as confirmed by Raman spectroscopy, thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy, and transmission electron microscopy. The Raman spectrum and TGA thermogram must be consistent with high quality single or multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Imaging by scanning electron microscopy must show high aspect ratio (a long length compared to their diameter), straight nanotubes. Imaging by transmission electron microscopy must show a high degree of graphitization.
- Also work for carbon nanotube deposition onto silicon carbide powders.
- Process the powder at a rate of greater than 1 kg / h.
- Include all the necessary interlocks for safe, hands-off operation by a trained operator.
- Be automated for programmable, repeatable operations.
- Be able to operate for 24 h without stopping.
- Include all gas cabinets needed for safe handling of process gases.
- Include all abatement systems needed for safe process gas exhausting.
- Have a footprint of less than 10 m2 and be less than 3 m in height.
- Work at pressures ranging from atmospheric to below 0.1 bar.
Background and Context
Carbon nanotubes — ceramic composites are of particular interest for developing light weight armour by Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC) and their clients. Through the DRDC-funded Advanced Ceramic Plate Technology project, NRC in collaboration with Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) and DRDC have been exploring methods for producing and sintering hybrid carbon nanotube ceramic materials in order to produce composite plates. Processing of ultrafine ceramic powders (e.g. Alteo P172LSB super ground reactive alumina, 99.8%, 0.4 µm D50) into carbon nanotube hybrids by chemical vapour deposition methods followed by high pressure sintering has been found to be a very promising approach. However, progress is currently limited by the available batch processing chemical vapour deposition reactor. The limitations are related to inhomogeneity of the sinterable hybrids, which leads to inhomogeneity in the sintered composite. This inhomogeneity can be traced to two sources. The first is clumping of the ceramic powder during catalyst deposition. This problem is currently being addressed by first calcining the catalyst precursor stained powder in air, followed by jet milling. This process is effective but is very time consuming and expensive. A more efficient process is desirable, such as the deposition of the catalyst concurrently with the carbon nanotube deposition (so-called floating catalyst chemical vapour deposition). The second source is related to the static, batch processing being employed. Currently, the powder is placed in a pan and processed as in a batch mode. This mode leads to depletion effects whereby the reactive gas concentration drops as one goes deeper into the thickness of the powder, leading to greater carbon nanotube deposition at the top of the powder layer than further down. NRC does not currently have a method of overcoming this problem; however, tumbling furnaces are commercially available to move the powder during processing and could be engineered into a chemical vapour reactor for carbon nanotube deposition. Other methods may also be possible, including possibly fluidized bed reactors or spray reactors.
Maximum value and travel
Multiple contracts could result from this Challenge.
The maximum funding available for any Phase 1 Contract resulting from this Challenge is $150,000.00 CAD (plus tax) including shipping, travel and living expenses, as applicable, for up to 6 months.
The maximum funding available for any Phase 2 Contract resulting from this Challenge is $1,000,000.00 CAD (plus tax) including shipping, travel and living expenses, as applicable, for up to 24 months. Only eligible businesses that have completed Phase 1 could be considered for Phase 2.
This disclosure is made in good faith and does not commit Canada to contract for the total approximate funding.
Travel
For Phase 1 it is anticipated that two meetings will require the successful bidder(s) to travel to the location identified below:
Kick-off meeting
Edmonton, AB
Final Review Meeting
Edmonton, AB
Eligibility
Solution proposals can only be submitted by a small business that meets all of the following criteria:
- for profit
- incorporated in Canada (federally or provincially)
- 499 or fewer full-time equivalent (FTE) employeesFootnote *
- research and development activities that take place in Canada
- 50% or more of its annual wages, salaries and fees are currently paid to employees and contractors who spend the majority of their time working in CanadaFootnote *
- 50% or more of its FTE employees have Canada as their ordinary place of workFootnote *
- 50% or more of its senior executives (Vice President and above) have Canada as their principal residenceFootnote *
Application guide
Evaluation Criteria
The official source of the Evaluation Criteria for this challenge is the Government Electronic Tendering System (Buy and Sell) (https://buyandsell.gc.ca/procurement-data/tender-notice/PW-18-00846769)
In the event of a discrepancy between the information below and the information published on Buy and Sell, Buy and Sell will take precedence.
Part 1: Mandatory and Minimum Pass Mark Criteria
Proposals must meet all mandatory criteria (Questions 1a and 2) and achieve the minimum pass mark for Question 3 in order to be deemed responsive and proceed to Part 2.
Question | Evaluation Schema |
---|---|
1 a. Scope Describe your proposed solution and how it responds to the challenge. Include in your description the scientific and technological basis upon which your solution is proposed and clearly identify how your solution meets all of the Essential Outcomes (if identified) in the Desired Outcomes and Considerations section in the Challenge Notice. |
Mandatory — Pass/Fail Pass Fail |
2. Current Technology Readiness Level (TRL)
|
Mandatory — Pass/Fail Pass: The Applicant/Bidder has demonstrated that the proposed solution is currently between TRLs 1 and 4 (inclusive), and provided justification by explaining the research and development (R&D) that has taken place to bring the solution to the stated TRL. Fail: The Applicant/Bidder has not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the current TRL is between 1 to 4 (inclusive) including:
|
3. Innovation Describe the novelty of your solution and how it advances the state-of-the-art over existing technologies, including competing solutions. |
Point Rated with Minimum Pass Mark The minimum pass mark for this criteria is 4 points. 0 points/Fail: The Applicant/Bidder has not demonstrated that the proposed solution advances the state-of-the-art over existing technologies, including available competing solutions; OR The stated advancements are described in general terms but are not substantiated with specific, measurable evidence. 4 points:
6 points:
8 points:
|
Part 2: Point-Rated Criteria
Proposals that do not achieve the overall minimum score of at least 55 points out of a possible 110 points (50%) will be declared non-responsive and given no further consideration.
The overall minimum score is determined by adding the Applicant/Bidder's scores from the following questions together (1b, 3, 4-13).
Question | Evaluation Schema |
---|---|
1b. Scope Describe how your proposed solution addresses the Additional Outcomes (if identified) in the Desired Outcomes and Considerations section in the Challenge Notice. If no Additional Outcomes are identified in the Challenge Notice, text entered in this section will not be considered. If no Additional Outcomes are identified in the Challenge Notice, Bidders/Applicants will receive 10 points |
|
4. Phase 1 Science and Technology Risks Identify potential scientific and/or technological risks to the successful development of the proof of concept and how they will be mitigated in Phase 1? |
|
5. Benefits to Canada Describe the benefits that could result from the successful development of your solution. Applicants/Bidders should consider the potential benefits using the following three categories:
|
|
6. Phase 1 Project Plan Demonstrate a feasible Phase 1 project plan by completing the table. Include:
Note: Phase 1 cannot exceed 6 months and TRL 4. |
|
7. Phase 1 Project Risks Identify potential project risks (eg. Human resources, financial, project management, etc) to the successful development of the proof of concept and how they will be mitigated? |
|
8. Phase 1 Implementation Team Demonstrate how your project implementation team has the required management and technological skill sets and experience to deliver the project plan for Phase 1 by completing the table. A member of the implementation team can have more than one role. Include the labour rates and level of effort for each member. A day is defined as 7.5 hours of work, exclusive of meal breaks. The labour rates and level of effort will be reviewed as part of the evaluation for Question 10. |
|
9. Inclusivity If your business were to receive funding from Innovative Solutions Canada, describe what actions (e.g., recruitment strategy, internships, co-op placements, etc.) might be taken in Phase 1 to support the participation of under-represented groups (e.g., women, youth, persons with disabilities, Indigenous people, visible minorities) in the research and development of the proposed solution. Each bidder/applicant in their response to this question must focus only on describing relevant programs, policies, or initiatives that it currently has in place or would put in place to support the R&D effort in Phase 1. Do not provide any personal information of individuals employed by your company or that of your subcontractors in the response below. |
|
10. Phase 1 Financial Proposal Demonstrate a realistic financial proposal for the Phase 1 project plan by completing the table. |
|
11. Phase 1 Financial Controls, Tracking and Oversight Describe the financial controls, tracking and oversight that will be used to manage the public funds throughout Phase 1. |
|
12. Phase 2 Strategy Describe a realistic strategy for the prototype development if selected to participate in Phase 2. Responses should include:
|
|
13. Commercialization Approach Describe your overall commercialization approach for the proposed solution. Responses should include:
|
|
Questions and answers
Please refer to the tender notice for this challenge on Buy and Sell.
All incoming questions regarding this specific challenge should be addressed to SIC-ISC@pwgsc.gc.ca
You can also consult the Frequently asked questions about the Innovative Solutions Canada Program.
A glossary is also available.