Artificial intelligence (AI)

We are seeking pre-commercial innovative prototypes that can be tested in real life settings and address a variety of priorities within the Government of Canada.

Funding opportunity sponsor:
Innovative Solutions Canada

Funding mechanism:
Contract

Opening date: 
June 27, 2025

Closing date: 
July 23, 2025, 14:00 Eastern Time

Overview

The Testing Stream aims to procure, test and evaluate innovative late stage pre-commercial prototypes.

The purpose of these Solicitation of Offers (SoOs) is to create pools of conditionally qualified innovations that Canada may select from to address a broad range of the Government of Canada organizations' requirements.

Each call includes a Standard Component and Military Component:

Standard component: $1,150,000 CAD

Military component: $2,300,000 CAD

If you meet the eligibility criteria and have a prototype that can respond to one of the problems below, apply now!

Problem statements

Robotic process automation and automated decision making

The rapid adoption and development of artificial intelligence (AI) and Robotic Process Automation (RPA) technologies present significant opportunities to transform how the Government of Canada (GC) delivers services. The integration of AI and RPA solutions offers the potential to automate routine tasks, enhance decision-making, and improve the efficiency of back-office operations.

The AI Strategy for the Federal Public Service outlines a vision for responsible GC adoption of AI for four objectives: deliver world-class services to its clients, protect our people and interests, achieve a more innovative and efficient workplace, and accelerate scientific discovery for the benefit of all..

The GoC is interested in testing AI and RPA technologies that can be adapted to provide solutions for government, capable of automating administrative workflows, performing data capture, improving data processing, and generating recommendations for decision-making purposes.

Definitions:
Artificial intelligence (AI):
A machine-based system that, for explicit or implicit objectives, infers, from the input it receives, how to generate outputs such as predictions, content, recommendations, or decisions that can influence physical or virtual environments. Different AI systems vary in their levels of autonomy and adaptiveness after deployment.
Automated decision-making:
Any technology that either assists or replaces the judgment of human decision-makers. These systems draw from fields like statistics, linguistics and computer science, and use techniques such as rules-based systems, regression, predictive analytics, machine learning, deep learning, and neural nets.
Explainability:
Explainability (also referred to as "interpretability") is the concept that an AI model and its output can be explained to the operator, through a methodological approach consistent with a reasoned principles.
Operational technology (OT):
Hardware and software systems that monitor and control physical devices, processes, and events within an organization.
Robotic process automation (RPA):
A process that can automate a set of routine instructions to perform. RPA allows for simple tasks to be completed at a high volume and speed with few or no errors.
Transparency:
The ability to understand how AI systems operate and make decisions, encompassing concepts such as AI explainability, governance and accountability.
Outcomes:

Innovations must meet at least one of the following outcomes to fulfill the requirements of the SC4 Evaluation Grid:

  • [1] RPA solutions that can analyze and automate data processing to perform repetitive administrative, technical, or laboratory tasks;
  • [2] AI solutions that can consume data (structured or unstructured) and make decisions to support the following use-cases:
    • [2A] Manage autonomous vehicle traffic and support the navigation of individual or multiple autonomous vehicle(s);
    • [2B] Optimize human resources processes to perform applicant screening and support employee onboarding by generating self-directed training curriculums;
    • [2C] Predict, assess, and model exposure to biothreats to support the management of human, animal or plant disease outbreaks;
    • [2D] Monitor patient health, model outcomes, and support healthcare decision making, or;
    • [2E] Strategic business support solutions to handle queries from a diverse user base of businesses and entrepreneurs that can make recommendations based on feedback from user interactions as well as data insights from disparate datasets to provide robust backend analytics for program and service analysis. The model should leverage previous interactions to optimize future recommendations.
  • [3] AI solutions for predictive maintenance or fault detection in OT or IT infrastructure that can:
    • [3A] Automate deployment processes by utilizing AI to support the setup and configuration of mobile IT systems, predicting optimal configurations and automating routine setup tasks;
    • [3B] Enhance mobile infrastructure by using AI-driven real-time data processing and decision-making tools capable of adapting to perform adjustments and optimize performance in response to changing conditions;
    • [3C] Perform remote monitoring, maintenance, and troubleshooting of IT and OT systems to identify potential issues, automate diagnostics, offer recommendations, and perform implementation, or;
    • [3D] Integrate AI to implement security measures and ensure compliance with relevant regulations and standards, including in mobile and deployable contexts.
  • [4] Technologies that can perform data-rich capture to convert images and non-text information, including audio and video, into data useable by AI-supported process automation or decision-making tools.

ISC will not accept any of the following (out of scope):

C4ISR – command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, reconnaissance, and surveillance

The Government of Canada (GC) is interested in testing enterprise-level information technology system solutions to advance Allied communication capabilities, support the integration of Joint Targeting systems, improve the resilience of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) Command and Control infrastructure, and support CAF through the adoption of modern technologies.

Advancements in the next generation of sensing and communication technologies underscore a need to deploy technologies that can support an array of functions to augment intelligence, improve surveillance, and perform reconnaissance.

The GC is interested in testing innovative technologies within four (4) areas of the C4ISR suite of technologies:

  • Sensor and surveillance technologies;
  • Multi-sensor data fusion technologies;
  • Data patterning and exploitation technologies, and;
  • Communications technologies.
Definitions:
C4ISR:
Command, Control, Communications, Computers (C4) Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR). Advanced C4ISR capabilities provide situational awareness, knowledge of the adversary and environment, and shorten the time between sensing, information synthesis, analysis, and response.
Artificial intelligence (AI):
A subfield of computer science that develops computer programs to behave in a way that would be considered intelligent if observed in a human (e.g., solves problems, learns from experience, understands language, interprets visual scenes).
Dark / Non-cooperative targets:
Targets that do not transmit signals or display markings that allow for easy identification.
Edge / Decentralized computing:
Edge computing moves a portion of storage and compute resources out of the central data center and closer to the source of the data itself. Rather than transmitting raw data to a central data center for processing and analysis, edge computing performs analysis closer to where the data is generated.
Machine learning (ML):
Refers to the technologies and algorithms that enable systems to identify patterns, make decisions, and improve themselves through experience and data. ML is primarily used to process large quantities of data very quickly using algorithms.
Pan-domain:
Solutions capable of operating in multiple domains or environments, including space, air, ground-based, underground or underwater. The term "pan-domain" indicates that solutions are not limited to a single type of environment or application.
Augmented reality (AR):
Technologies that add digital elements over real-world views.
Virtual reality (VR):
A computer-generated environment that simulates a physical presence.
EO/IR sensor system:
Electro-Optical/Infra-Red systems are imaging systems which include both visible and infrared sensors.
Hyperspectral devices:
hyperspectral imaging (HSI) sensors acquire imagery in hundreds of narrow, contiguous spectral bands having a few nanometers spectral width, which facilitates fine discrimination between different features on the Earth's surface
Multi-sensor fusion and analysis:
solutions capable of combining information from several sources to form a unified picture or data set for analysis.
Outcomes:

Innovations must meet at least one of the following outcomes to meet the requirements of the SC4 Call for Proposals Evaluation Grid. Identify in your proposal which outcome(s) you have selected:

  • [1] Advanced sensor and surveillance technologies:
    • [1A] Innovative hyperspectral imaging sensor technologies capable of capturing spectral data at different wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum;
    • [1B] Innovative visible and near-infrared sensor systems for low-light imaging applications such as target detection and identification at night and under very low illumination conditions;
    • [1C] Innovative solutions to detect and geolocate non-cooperative targets;
    • [1D] Innovative EO/IR sensor systems able to provide high dynamic range imaging for both bright and dim targets across different environments;
    • [1E] Innovative technologies to measures distances and depth that leverage EO/IR sensor systems or neuromorphic cameras, or;
    • [1F] Innovative space surveillance technologies using low size, weight, and power (SWaP) hyperspectral imaging payloads onboard satellites to enable space surveillance and reconnaissance.
  • [2] Multi-sensor fusion and analysis technologies with training capabilities:
    • [2A] Innovative solutions that can integrate and visualize data (e.g., optical, radar, infrared), from various sensors into a unified framework to enhance accuracy and enable analysis, consistent with the TAK;
    • [2B] Innovative AI or human-interface adaptive data fusion technologies that can adjust the fusion process based on the changing quality and type of incoming sensor data to perform real-time adaptation, or;
    • [2C] Innovative geospatial analysis tools that integrate and interpret data from various sensors to improve object recognition and object classification to support real-time situational analysis.
  • [3] Advanced data exploitation and patterning technologies:
    • [3A] Innovative edge, decentralized, or peripheral computing solutions that process data closer to the source to reduce latency and improve the speed of real-time analysis;
    • [3B] Innovative solutions that can analyze data and establish a hierarchy of importance, based on established mission parameters, to determine the prioritization of information sharing in austere or low-bandwidth environments where complete information transfer may not be possible;
    • [3C] Innovative solutions that can improve upon the exploitation of data acquired by sensor systems to support faster object detection, tracking, and recognition;
    • [3D] Innovative solutions that can exploit hyperspectral image data to generate analytics in near real-time to support pan-domain operational applications;
    • [3E] Innovative and novel modeling techniques to characterize and pattern data acquired by sensor systems, or;
    • [3F] Innovative and novel systems that use AR or VR to overlay multi-sensor data onto physical environments.
  • [4] Advanced communication technologies:
    • [4A] Novel high-speed, low-latency communications that facilitate real-time data exchange between control centers and field units in pan-domain environments;
    • [4B] Solutions to establish resilient communication networks used to relay information, improve connectivity and support operational reliability in austere environments with weak or intermittent coverage, or;
    • [4C] Light or laser-based optical communication technologies.

ISC will not accept:

  • Solutions proposed under the "[2] Multi-Sensor Fusion and Analysis Technologies" sub-heading that do not have related training components. Training is required to facilitate quick and reliable uptake across the GC; solutions should be intuitive and usable with minimal (<10 hours) training.
  • Solutions that do not follow the Tactical Assault Kit (TAK) nomenclature. TAK is a geospatial software application widely used across the GC; adherence to TAK standards is required to ensure useability and interoperability.
  • Solutions proposed under "[3] Advanced Data Exploitation and Patterning Technologies" sub-heading that do not map individual sensor inputs when performing data fusion. Individual sensor mapping is required to ensure data is factored appropriately and weighted accurately.
  • Solutions proposed under "[4] Advanced Communication Technologies" sub-heading that do not have safeguards to restrict access, secure communications, and prevent intrusion.

Eligibility and evaluation

Stage 1 - Mandatory technical criteria

MC1: Canadian Offeror

The Offeror must be a Canadian Offeror. A Canadian Offeror is defined as a Canadian person or entity submitting an Offer on its own behalf and having a place of business in Canada where the person or entity conducts activities on a permanent basis that is clearly identified by name and accessible during normal working hours.

MC2: Canadian content

At least 80% of the financial proposal costs, the total proposal price to Canada stated in "Section–G Financial proposal", must be Canadian goods or Canadian services. For the complete definition of "Canadian goods" and "Canadian services" please refer to Annex Solicitation of Offers Definitions of the solicitation number EN578-25ISC2 on the Canada Buys Website.

MC3: Ownership

The Offeror must be the owner of the Intellectual Property (IP) for the proposed innovation or hold a valid exclusive licence for the IP rights from a Canadian licensor for the proposed innovation. The Offeror must also ensure that the proposed innovation does not infringe on any existing IP rights.

MC4: Pre-commercial status

The proposed innovation must not be openly available in the marketplace, and must not have been previously sold on a commercial basis as of the date of the submission of the offer. Refer to the definitions of Pre-Commercial Innovation and Commercial Sales at Annex Contract Definitions of the solicitation number EN578-25ISC2 on the Canada Buys Website.

Note: Pre-commercial status can include the significant modification of an existing technology or processes applied in a government setting for which current applications are not possible or feasible.

MC5: Previously conditionally-qualified innovation

The proposed innovation or any other versions of the proposed innovation must not have been previously awarded a contract in the Build in Canada Innovation Program (BCIP) or its predecessor, the Canadian Innovation Commercialization Program (CICP), nor under the Innovative Solutions Canada (ISC) Testing Stream.

The proposed innovation or any other versions of the proposed innovation must not currently be active in a pool of conditionally-qualified innovations. A proposed innovation that is currently active in a pool will be considered only if the offer validity period for that Offer has expired or the Offeror has withdrawn their innovation from the relevant pool, prior to the solicitation closing date and time.

Offerors are limited to submitting only one (1) offer per outcome for each Problem Statement under this solicitation. If the proposed innovation is similar or identical to an innovation previously submitted by the Offeror that is currently active in a pool and has not been withdrawn prior to solicitation closing, the following assessment will be used to determine sufficient difference to proceed.

Pass

Sufficiently different

  • A distinct product and/or service that has undergone a completely separate path of R&D or that diverged early in technology development; or
  • Significant modifications to the application of the previous technology or components of the technology, applied in a setting or condition which was not possible or feasible for the conditionally-qualified or contracted innovation; or
  • A significant improvement in functionality, cost or performance over the conditionally-qualified or contracted innovation.
Fail

Not sufficiently different

  • Incremental improvements; or
  • Technologies that follow a normal course of product development (i.e. the next version or release); or
  • Stated differences are not quantified or are inadequately described.

MC6: Program Eligibility

The Offeror's submission must align with the mandate of the ISC Testing Stream, as stated in the solicitation number EN578-25ISC2 on the Canada Buys Website, under which Canada procures the Offeror's Innovation through a Contract for testing it in an operational environment. This takes into account assurance that the innovation is ready to test in an operational environment, at the time of the submission of the offer.

MC7: Offeror Presence in Canada

The Offeror must meet the following minimum requirements:

  • 50% or more of the Offeror's full time equivalent (FTE) employees must have Canada as their ordinary place of work;
  • 50% or more of the Offeror's annual wages, salaries and fees must be paid to employees and contractors who spend the majority of their time working in Canada;
  • and 50% or more of the Offeror's senior executives (Vice President and above) must have their principal residence in Canada.

These calculations must take into account affiliated businesses, such as parent companies and subsidiaries that are either in or outside of Canada.

Stage 2 – Screening criteria (SC)

SC1: Innovation

The proposed innovation must meet one or more of the ISC definitions of innovation below:

  • An inventionFootnote 1, new technology or new process that is not currently available in the marketplace.
  • Significant modifications to the application of existing technologies/components/processes that are applied in a setting or condition for which current applications are not possible or feasible, including government applications.
  • An improvement in functionality, cost or performance over an existing technology/process that is considered state-of-the-art or the current industry best practice.
Pass
  • The proposed innovation meets one or more of the ISC definitions of innovation.
Fail
  • The proposed innovation does not meet any of the ISC definitions of innovation; or
  • The proposed innovation is an incremental improvement, "good engineering", or a technology that would go ahead in the normal course of product development (i.e. the next version or release).

SC2: Operational Readiness Validation

The Offeror must demonstrate that, at the time of offer submission, the proposed innovation is feasibly ready for testing in an operational environment. In other words, the proposed innovation should be at TRL 7 or above according to the ISC Technology Readiness Level Scale (TRL 7 definition: Prototype system ready (form, fit, and function) for testing in an appropriate operational environment).

Pass
  • The Offeror has provided evidence demonstrating that, at a minimum, the proposed innovation is a functional prototype (form, fit, and function) as per the ISC Technology Readiness Level Scale; and
  • The Offeror has provided evidence supporting that an operational test of the proposed innovation is feasible at the time of the offer submission.
Fail
  • The proposed innovation from the Offeror has not provided evidence demonstrating that, at a minimum, the proposed innovation is a functional prototype (form, fit and function) as per the ISC Technology Readiness Level Scale; or
  • The Offeror has not provided evidence supporting that an operational test of the proposed innovation is feasible at the time of the offer submission.

SC3: Risks Considerations

The Offeror must demonstrate that they have obtained or possess, at the time of offer submission, the certifications, the licences, and approvals required to safely deploy the proposed innovation, and that it poses no risks to individuals or the potential test partner involved in an operational test.

This is to ensure that the potential test partner is not exposed to safety or privacy risks during the conduct of the operational test.

Pass

At the time of offer submission:

  • The Offeror has demonstrated that they have assessed for risks associated with the safe deployment of the proposed innovation in an operational test;
  • If applicable, the Offeror has demonstrated that they have obtained or possess the certifications, the licences, and approvals required to safely deploy the proposed innovation in an operational test; and
  • No concerns remain regarding the physical safety and privacy of individuals that could be involved in an operational test; and
  • The proposed innovation does not pose organizational safety or security concerns for the potential test partner when used in an operational setting; and
  • Where applicable, the Offeror has mitigated risks during the operational test related to:
    • The potential test partner's assets: strategies to ensure the safety of equipment, data, personnel, and operational integrity;
    • Broader impacts during an operational test: strategies to ensure the protection of the population, infrastructure, and information;
    • Ethical & Legal compliance, technical & cybersecurity risks, and civilian & infrastructure protection considerations; and
    • The mitigation strategies to address the identified risks are feasible and well described. However, minimal risks remain to the potential test partner involved in an operational test.
Fail

At the time of offer submission:

  • The Offeror has failed to demonstrate that they have assessed for risks associated with the safe deployment of the proposed innovation in an operational test; or
  • If applicable, the Offeror has failed to demonstrate that they have obtained or possess the certifications, the licences, and approvals required to safely deploy the proposed innovation in an operational test; or
  • Concerns remain regarding the physical safety or privacy of individuals that could be involved in an operational test; or
  • The proposed innovation may pose organizational safety or security concerns for the potential test partner when used in an operational setting; or
  • Where applicable, the Offeror has failed to demonstrate that they have mitigated risks during the operational test related to:
    • The potential test partner's assets: strategies to ensure the safety of equipment, data, personnel, and operational integrity;
    • Broader impacts during an operational test: strategies to ensure the protection of the population, infrastructure, and information;
    • Ethical & Legal compliance, technical & cybersecurity risks, and civilian & infrastructure protection considerations; or
    • The mitigation strategies are inadequate, and significant risks remain to the test partner during the operational test.

SC4: Scope – outcomes

The Offeror must demonstrate that the proposed innovation provides a solution to the problem statement and meets one or more of the outcomes selected by the Offeror.

Pass
  • The proposed innovation is within the scope of the selected problem statement and clearly addresses one or more of the outcomes selected by the Offeror.
Fail
  • The proposed innovation is out-of-scope for the problem statement and the relevant outcome (s) selected by the Offeror; or
  • The Offer does not clearly demonstrate how the proposed innovation addresses any one of the outcomes selected by the Offeror; or
  • The proposed innovation is poorly described and does not permit concrete analysis; or
  • There is little to no scientific and/or technological evidence that the proposed innovation is likely to meet any of the outcomes.

Stage 3 – Point-Rated Screening Criteria (PS)

PS1: Advance on State of the Art

The Offeror must demonstrate that the proposed innovation improves upon current approaches and state of the art, or current practices relevant to its purpose or application, in a manner that yields competitive advantages.

2 points
  • The proposed innovation improves minimally upon the current state of the art, though not sufficiently enough to create competitive advantages in existing market niches; or
  • The stated advancements are not substantiated with specific, measurable evidence.
12 points
  • The proposed innovation offers one or two minor improvements, and no significant improvements, to the state of the art that are not likely to create competitive advantages in existing market niches; or
  • The stated advancements are well-described in general, but are not substantiated with specific, measurable evidence.
24 points minimum
  • The proposed innovation offers three or more minor improvements to the state of the art, that together are likely to create competitive advantages in existing market niches; or
  • The proposed innovation offers one significant improvement to the state of the art, that is likely to create competitive advantages in existing market niches.
40 points
  • The proposed innovation offers two or more significant improvements to the state of the art, that are likely to create competitive advantages in existing market niches and could define new market spaces; or
  • The proposed innovation can be considered a new benchmark of state of the art that is clearly ahead of competitors and that is likely to define new market spaces.

PS2: Intellectual property (IP) strategy

The Offeror must demonstrate a suitable IP strategy, relevant to protect IP generated by the proposed innovation and to protect the Offeror. This criterion also assesses the degree to which the strategy is appropriate to support successful commercialization.

0 points The Intellectual Property (IP) strategy is insufficiently rationalized or substantiated, and is poorly suited for background IP or generated IP as they pertain to the proposed innovation.
8 points minimum
  • The ongoing activities described and rationalized form a suitable IP strategy in terms of relevant background IP or generated IP, and enables the application of suitable protection where and when relevant, as they pertain to the proposed innovation; and
  • The Offeror describes an IP strategy factoring current available resources of the company for the effective and competitive leveraging of IP in terms of profitable exploitation and market access.
12 points
  • The activities described are well substantiated and form an IP strategy that addresses all relevant background IP and generated IP as they pertain to the proposed innovation, and will ensure the Offeror is protected; and
  • The Offeror described an IP strategy factoring considerations such as the current available resources of the company and the future state of the company after the operational test of the proposed innovation, for the effective and competitive leveraging of IP in terms of profitable exploitation and market access.

Stage 4 – Point Rated Criteria (PR)

PR1: Equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) benefits

This criterion is intended to assess the degree to which the Offeror has sufficient measures to effectively achieve and maintain diversity, inclusivity and gender equity within; their business, supply chain, or business ecosystem.

Score levels reflect the number of the following elements the Offeror addressed in their answer:

  • Anti-discrimination policies;
  • Recruitment strategy and hiring process;
  • Training available to educate the Offeror's workforce on diversity and inclusion;
  • How diversity and inclusion are factored into Offeror's supplier selection methods.
0 points Policies regarding diversity, inclusivity and gender equity are not identified, or are insufficient.
4 points Information provided clearly demonstrates that the Offeror is currently implementing or will implement two (2) EDI elements to achieve and maintain diversity, inclusivity and gender equity.
8 points Information provided clearly demonstrates that the Offeror is implementing or will implement three (3) EDI elements to achieve and maintain diversity, inclusivity and gender equity.
12 points Information provided clearly demonstrates that the Offeror is implementing or will implement all four (4) EDI elements to achieve and maintain diversity, inclusivity and gender equity.

PR2: Commercialization strategy

This criterion is intended for the Offeror to demonstrate that they have a credible strategy to commercialize the proposed innovation.

0 points
  • The presented commercialization strategy is inadequate, incomplete or has not been presented.
8 points
  • The presented commercialization strategy could support limited target market entry; or
  • Shortcomings in the expertise, human resources, partners/sales channels or physical assets to successfully commercialize the proposed innovation.
24 points
  • The presented commercialization strategy, is clear and well-developed and, given full implementation, should support entry into the target market; or
  • A majority of the expertise, human resources, partners/sales channels and physical assets are present, to successfully commercialize the proposed innovation.
32 points
  • The presented commercialization strategy, is complete, strong, and is highly likely to support long-term and sustained entry into the target markets; or
  • The Offeror has the expertise, human resources, partners/sales channels and physical assets required to move forward with successful commercialization of the proposed innovation.

In order to conditionally-qualify an Offer must score a minimum of 60 points out of 96 points as a sum of all points from Stage 3 and Stage 4 criteria.

Pathway to commercialization (PTC)

Enabling the Government of Canada to buy what it tries – a Pathway to Commercialization for eligible Canadian SMEs

Our new pilot project gives small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) the opportunity to sell your innovation directly to the Government of Canada.

Through the PTC under ISC's Testing Stream, eligible SMEs can receive commercial contracts based on the successful testing and market-readiness of your pre-commercial prototype. It is important to note that this pathway will only be available to eligible Canadian SMEs, which represent over 97% of all businesses in Canada, a percentage that mirrors past participation in the program.

How will it work?

  • Once your initial ISC testing contract is completed, you may be eligible for the Pathway to Commercialization if your innovation is market-ready above technology readiness level (TRL) 9
  • You will have up to 12 months following the end of your initial ISC Testing Stream contract to apply to the Pathway to Commercialization, at which time you will be assessed against the PTC entry criteria to determine if your innovation will be placed on a PTC source list where government departments can browse and purchase your successfully-tested innovations for up to three years

Important considerations

  • You must be selling the same innovation from your initial Testing Stream contract
  • If you participate in the PTC, you will no longer be eligible for additional testing through the Testing Stream. Unlike PTC contracts, additional testing contracts are still considered R&D contracts, similar to the initial Testing Stream contract. Additional testing opportunities are open to all program participants, SMEs and non-SMEs.
  • The requirements for commercial contracts will reflect the operational needs of client departments, the nature of the innovation, as well as input from Public Services and Procurement Canada, the program's Contracting Authority.

How will SMEs be assessed?

A number of criteria will be used as part of the assessment process, including:

  • Financial capacity
  • Technology readiness
  • Certifications
  • IP strategy
  • Company size
  • Scalability
  • Innovation test performance

Please read the call for proposals (CFP) for more information on the Pathway to Commercialization.

Questions

All incoming questions regarding this specific call for proposals should be addressed to TPSGC.PASICVoletessai-APISCTestingStream.PWGSC@tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca.

glossary is also available.