Precision agriculture technology is tailored to farms above 500 acres in size, so with farms below that acreage, or with an annual income below $75,000, the rate of adoption of these technologies declines significantly.
Sponsoring Department: Agriculture and Agri-food Canada (AAFC)
Funding Mechanism: Grant
Opening date: October 18, 2018
Closing date: December 17, 2018, 14:00 Eastern Standard Tim
Log in to view your submissions
Challenge
Summary
Precision agriculture technology is tailored to farms above 500 acres in size, so with farms below that acreage, or with an annual income below $75,000, the rate of adoption of these technologies declines significantly.
Problem Statement
Precision agriculture/"smart" farming is a practice that uses automated data gathering technologies, such as variable rate mapping, artificial intelligence, and digital imagery, to guide targeted farm management activities (e.g., seeding, input application, harvesting) to improve the sustainability, efficiency, and productivity of agricultural operations. The benefits include lower input costs, increased yields, enhanced environmental sustainability and better-informed management decisions. However, the software that powers these technologies (and the associated updates) is expensive due to the development costs, and for smaller farms (<500 acres), it is difficult for them to recoup their initial investment over a reasonable time frame. Recently, there has been interest among companies and other stakeholders that serve smaller-acreage farms that developing the enabling software using a common, open-source platform may be the best route to lower the initial and ongoing costs of acquiring precision agriculture/"smart" farming technologies. This challenge is seeking a solution that will see precision agriculture/"smart" farming technologies cost-scaled appropriately so benefits can be realized for smaller-acre operations, rather than for all farm sizes.
Desired outcomes and Considerations
Essential Outcomes
The solution must:
- Develop a new technology and/or adapt existing ones for small and medium sized businesses
- Include the scaling down of existing precision agriculture/"smart" farming technologies for smaller farms in a way that is affordable for smaller farms.
Additional Outcomes
The solution should:
- Include the development of an open-source data platform.
Background and Context
AAFC data shows that 40% of farms above 500 acres are adopting most precision agriculture technologies such as GPS and Autosteer. Improved accessibility of these technologies for small producers will lead to greater rates of adoption among farms below 500 acres, or with an annual income below $75,000. Many precision agriculture technologies are not used by farms under 500 acres. For example, only 13% use AutoSteer. 8% use precision maps. The same is true of farms earning less than $75,000 per year. In that case 53% uses Autosteer, and 23% uses precision maps. There is an increase in uptake above this threshold. For example in farms above 500 acres, 44% use Autosteer, and in farms about $75,000 as year income, 63% use Autosteer.
Maximum value and travel
Maximum grant value
Multiple grants could result from this Challenge.
Funding of up to $150,000.00 CAD for up to 6 months could be available for any Phase 1 grant resulting from this Challenge.
Funding of up to $1,000,000.00 CAD for up to 2 years could be available for any Phase 2 grant resulting from this Challenge. Only eligible businesses that received Phase 1 funding could be considered for Phase 2.
This disclosure is made in good faith and does not commit Canada to award any grant for the total maximum funding value.
Travel:
No travel is anticipated for Phase 1
Kick-off meeting
Teleconference/videoconference
Progress Review Meeting
Teleconference/videoconference
Final Review Meeting
Teleconference/videoconference
Eligibility
Solution proposals can only be submitted by a small business that meets all of the following criteria:
- for profit
- incorporated in Canada (federally or provincially)
- 499 or fewer full-time equivalent (FTE) employeesFootnote *
- research and development activities that take place in Canada
- 50% or more of its annual wages, salaries and fees are currently paid to employees and contractors who spend the majority of their time working in CanadaFootnote *
- 50% or more of its FTE employees have Canada as their ordinary place of workFootnote *
- 50% or more of its senior executives (Vice President and above) have Canada as their principal residenceFootnote *
Application guide
Evaluation Criteria
Part 1: Mandatory and Minimum Pass Mark Criteria
Proposals must meet all mandatory criteria (Questions 1a and 2) and achieve the minimum pass mark for Question 3 in order to be deemed responsive and proceed to Part 2.
Question | Evaluation Schema |
---|---|
1 a. Scope Describe your proposed solution and how it responds to the challenge. Include in your description the scientific and technological basis upon which your solution is proposed and clearly identify how your solution meets all of the EssentialOutcomes (if identified) in the Desired Outcomes and Considerations section in the Challenge Notice. |
Mandatory - Pass/Fail Pass Fail |
2. Current Technology Readiness Level (TRL)
|
Mandatory - Pass/Fail Pass: The Applicant/Bidder has demonstrated that the proposed solution is currently between TRLs 1 and 4 (inclusive), and provided justification by explaining the research and development (R&D) that has taken place to bring the solution to the stated TRL. Fail: The Applicant/Bidder has not provided sufficient evidence to demonstrate that the current TRL is between 1 to 4 (inclusive) including:
|
3. Innovation Describe the novelty of your solution and how it advances the state-of-the-art over existing technologies, including competing solutions. |
Point Rated with Minimum Pass Mark The minimum pass mark for this criteria is 4 points. 0 points/Fail: The Applicant/Bidder has not demonstrated that the proposed solution advances the state-of-the-art over existing technologies, including available competing solutions; OR The stated advancements are described in general terms but are not substantiated with specific, measurable evidence. 4 points:
6 points:
8 points:
|
Part 2: Point-Rated Criteria
Proposals that do not achieve the overall minimum score of at least 55 points out of a possible 110 points (50%) will be declared non-responsive and given no further consideration.
The overall minimum score is determined by adding the Applicant/Bidder's scores from the following questions together (1b, 3, 4-13).
Question | Evaluation Schema |
---|---|
1b. Scope Describe how your proposed solution addresses the Additional Outcomes (if identified) in the Desired Outcomes and Considerations section in the Challenge Notice. If no Additional Outcomes are identified in the Challenge Notice, Bidders/Applicants will receive 10 points |
|
4. Phase 1 Science and Technology Risks Identify potential scientific and/or technological risks to the successful development of the proof of concept and how they will be mitigated in Phase 1? |
|
5. Benefits to Canada Describe the benefits that could result from the successful development of your solution. Applicants/Bidders should consider the potential benefits using the following three categories:
|
|
6. Phase 1 Project Plan Demonstrate a feasible Phase 1 project plan by completing the table. Include:
Note: Phase 1 cannot exceed 6 months and TRL 4. |
|
7. Phase 1 Project Risks Identify potential project risks (eg. Human resources, financial, project management, etc) to the successful development of the proof of concept and how they will be mitigated? |
|
8. Phase 1 Implementation Team Demonstrate how your project implementation team has the required management and technological skill sets and experience to deliver the project plan for Phase 1 by completing the table. A member of the implementation team can have more than one role. Include the labour rates and level of effort for each member. A day is defined as 7.5 hours of work, exclusive of meal breaks. The labour rates and level of effort will be reviewed as part of the evaluation for Question 10. |
|
9. Inclusivity If your business were to receive funding from Innovative Solutions Canada, describe what actions (e.g., recruitment strategy, internships, co-op placements, etc.) might be taken in Phase 1 to support the participation of under-represented groups (e.g., women, youth, persons with disabilities, Indigenous people, visible minorities) in the research and development of the proposed solution. |
|
10. Phase 1 Financial Proposal Demonstrate a realistic financial proposal for the Phase 1 project plan by completing the table. |
|
11. Phase 1 Financial Controls, Tracking and Oversight Describe the financial controls, tracking and oversight that will be used to manage the public funds throughout Phase 1. |
|
12. Phase 2 Strategy Describe a realistic strategy for the prototype development if selected to participate in Phase 2. Responses should include:
|
|
13. Commercialization Approach Describe your overall commercialization approach for the proposed solution. Responses should include:
|
|
Questions and answers
All incoming questions regarding a specific challenge will be posted here with the corresponding response.
If you have a question about a challenge, please send it to ISED-ISDE@canada.ca.
You can also consult the Frequently asked questions about the Innovative Solutions Canada Program.
A glossary is also available.
Will proposals covering sensing technologies that are real-time, and involve automated analysis of milk quality without any addition of chemicals or consumables be considered?
Yes, those proposals will be considered.